Men should really stop whineging about how bias society is towards women. All they need to do is take co-ordinated action and replicate the methods successfully applied by women, and then with time, balance will be restored.

The promotional skills of the fairer sex have indeed resulted in bias at all levels and bizarrely this would not have been possible without some passive collusion from men.  For example, in the past decade employment laws have made it very unattractive to hire women into senior positions because of the inherent risks of being sued when employment does not work out for whatever reason. Yet senior women are still hired by men. The outlandish payouts female workers have achieved in the City for example, a testament to male persistency in hiring woman almost regardless of their ability.

Courts have the uncanny ability to make it seem that the employer is at fault, so inevitably it’s often easier to agree some sought of payoff rather go down longer and even more expensive routes. Women have multiplied their redundancy payouts on the premise that employers had hired no other women hence demonstrating sexual discrimination. In many cases no woman had actually applied for positions.

In TCE’s experience women are mainly hired in the City to create a natural balance in the work place. 90% of the applicants for meaningful City jobs are male, although if Harriet Harman had her way employers would be obliged to hire the female candidates regardless of merit.

Women, we are led to believe by women, are down trodden and deserving of extra special treatment because of society’s systemic bias towards men, and yet evidence only exists to the contrary.

In recent headline divorce cases women have managed to extract scandalous amounts of cash from self made men who have not relied on their non working wife’s ‘contribution’ in any way. In many cases the marriages were short and typically started years after the wealth had been generated. These poor ladies of leisure had ritually sacrificed their own ‘careers’, we were told. The courts normally ruling that the ladies should be set for life with settlements many times realistic career earnings. After all, they have to maintain the lifestyle gifted to them by the man in the first place.

As Britain has passed somehow seamlessly to the systemic and extreme bias in favour of women, the likes of Harriet Harman ‘Minister for Women’, remain unsatisfied. The anti father campaigner, will do her best to further society’s drive against men. But take heart men, she’s flailing; first the loan scandal,  the anti stab vest bungle in Peckham, and the Sir Fed Goodwin rant on TV, have removed what little credibility she had left.

Men, insist on the election of a ‘Minister for Men’, insist on equal retirement age for men, insist that women campaign on causes like cancer for both sexes not just the type that hits them, insist that men can actually bring up a young family if they were financed in the same way as women, tell the world that looking after children is a great deal easier than earning a living (looking after children is simply a repetitive, dull, and less skilled occupation).

Simply insist that equality is returned, and that politic correctness is not simply a term created by women to ensure that society favours them.